View unanswered posts | View active topics
Forum rules
PLEASE, since this is an expert forum, only post a response to your OWN topic.
 
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 2 posts ] |
|
| Author |
Message |
|
MXandSXracer21
|
 Posted: Mon Jan 20, 2014 1:43 pm |
|
Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2012 10:59 pm
Posts: 15
|
|
I am planning on getting a higher end heart rate monitor with GPS capability. Two of the ones I have been looking at are the Polar RC3 and the Polar RCX5. Im having a hard time trying to decide which to go with. Both are about the same price at the place I am going to purchase from. The main differences I see are that the RCX5 does not have integrated GPS and that it has better waterproofing. Aside from that, I am not sure if there are other distinct differences, that allows one to edge out the other. So perhaps someone that has experience with them could elaborate.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Virtual Trainer
|
Posted: Tue Jan 21, 2014 4:07 pm |
|
 |
| Site Admin |
 |
Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 11:48 pm
Posts: 1199
Location: Richmond, VA
|
|
I own the RC3 because I like the integrated GPS. They are both great watches. I didn't want the added hassle of the external GPS.
- Tim
_________________ Tim Crytser Your Virtual Trainer www.racerxVT.com 
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 2 posts ] |
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Login
FAQ
Search